2026 Sustainability Trends Every Facility Manager Needs to Know

Discover the top 5 sustainability trends facility managers need to know in 2026—from performance standards to IAQ, refrigerants, and more.

Ava Montini

Jan 20, 2026

Written by

Published on

A new year, new pressures

For facility and energy managers, 2026 is not just another lap around the operations cycle. The stakes are rising across the built environment: carbon targets are evolving from voluntary goals to enforceable standards, utility grids are growing more dynamic, and your systems are being asked to deliver more than comfort—they’re being asked to demonstrate climate performance.

This change comes at a moment when global energy demand is accelerating. In 2024, energy demand rose 2.2% globally (faster than the decade-long average), while electricity demand jumped 4.3%, driven by electrification, extreme weather, and digital growth. IEA In the buildings sector alone, electricity use increased by over 600 TWh (5%), accounting for nearly 60% of total growth in global electricity use. IEA Blob Storage And forecasts suggest this upward trend will continue: the U.S. Energy Information Administration projects that global energy consumption will grow through 2050, outpacing efficiency gains unless stronger policies intervene. EIA

The challenge is that these changes don’t arrive all at once or in obvious ways. They show up gradually—through updated codes, shifting tariffs, new equipment standards, and increasing expectations from tenants and investors. The upside is that facility and energy managers, once working mostly behind the scenes, are now central to turning sustainability commitments into measurable results.

Here are five sustainability trends shaping 2026, and why each matters for the decisions you’ll make in your mechanical rooms, dashboards, and boardrooms.

1. Building Performance Standards move from paper to practice

A decade ago, sustainability reporting was a quarterly or annual exercise filed internally or sent to corporate. Today, Building Performance Standards (BPS) are shifting that paradigm: they tie a building’s actual energy use and emissions to regulatory thresholds, making performance more than just a nice-to-have.

Across the U.S., BPS and similar mandates now exist in nine localities and three states, with penalties or compliance mechanisms for underperforming buildings. (ACEEE) In Canada, cities like Vancouver have already adopted performance standards, and other municipalities are actively exploring similar rules. (Efficiency Canada) Natural Resources Canada also recognizes that BPS policies enable jurisdictions to regulate energy or emissions in existing buildings. (Natural Resources Canada)

Europe is several steps ahead. Through the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, member states are required to set minimum energy performance standards for existing buildings and align them with long-term decarbonization goals. That trajectory suggests North America is likely to follow a similar path, with more cities and provinces phasing in binding performance requirements over the next decade.

For facility teams, this is a shift in mindset: hitting a design target isn’t enough. What matters now is day-to-day performance. Keeping HVAC systems tuned, filters low-pressure, ventilation right-sized, and carbon data tracked continuously.

Treat compliance not as a one-off capital project, but as a persistent operations program. Teams that build strong discipline in data, trending, and low-cost O&M measures (filter swaps, economizer tuning, drift checks) will free up budget (and carbon headroom) to take on higher-stakes retrofits later.

2. Grid-interactive buildings become the norm

The grid you’re tied into is no longer a fixed backdrop. It’s dynamic. As renewables rise, carbon intensity swings hour by hour. In many regions, the grid’s carbon intensity can vary by over 1,000 g CO₂/kWh between low and high hours. EnergyTag

This variability is why hourly accounting, not annual averages, is becoming the standard: studies find that relying solely on yearly emission factors can bias carbon inventories by as much as 35 %, especially in areas with high grid variability. itspubs.ucdavis.edu

For facility managers, your job isn’t just to reduce consumption, but rather to shift it. Running air handlers or pushing large loads at 3 p.m. on a carbon-intensive grid can erase much of the value of your efficiency gains. But shifting that same load to cleaner hours can multiply your CO₂e savings.

Buildings that provide demand flexibility (the ability to curtail, shift, or modulate loads) not only ease grid stress but also help integrate renewables and reduce emissions. ScienceDirect The U.S. DOE’s Grid-Interactive Efficient Buildings (GEB) initiative explicitly frames buildings as potential distributed energy resources (DERs) that can respond to grid signals. The Department of Energy's Energy

Facilities that align their systems with grid conditions will capture more carbon value, reduce costs, and position themselves for utility incentives and grid services.

3. Indoor Air Quality and Energy are no longer trade-offs

The pandemic showed that “just add more outside air” is not a sustainable strategy. It drove home the fact that healthier air doesn’t have to mean higher energy bills. In 2023, ASHRAE Standard 241 introduced the concept of Equivalent Clean Airflow (ECAi): a performance-based framework that lets you meet air quality targets with the right combination of ventilation, filtration, and air cleaning instead of defaulting to maximum outdoor air. (ASHRAE)

This matters even more in 2026 because the carbon penalty of over-ventilation is steep. Conditioning excess outside air can account for a significant share of building energy use, especially in regions with temperature or humidity extremes. U.S. EPA modelling has shown that raising outdoor air rates from 5 to 20 cfm per person can sharply increase HVAC energy costs, depending on the climate and system type. (EPA)

The opportunity is to deliver the same (or better) air quality at a lower energy cost. Low-pressure, high-efficiency filtration plays a central role here. Studies show that filter design, not just MERV rating, dictates pressure drop and energy impact. Well-engineered filters with optimized media and geometry can deliver higher capture efficiency at lower resistance than standard pleated filters, reducing fan energy while still supporting ASHRAE 241 clean-air goals. (ScienceDirect)

The play in 2026: pair low-pressure filtration with calibrated demand-controlled ventilation (DCV) and proven air cleaning technologies. Together, they provide safe indoor air with the lowest possible energy penalty. IAQ and carbon goals don’t have to compete. They can reinforce each other when filtration efficiency and system pressure are managed by design.

4. Refrigerant rules shift the replacement playbook

If you’re spec’ing new HVAC or refrigeration equipment in 2026, refrigerant selection matters just as much as capacity. Under the U.S. AIM Act, the EPA is phasing down production and consumption of high-GWP HFCs—aiming to cut them to just 15% of historic baseline levels by mid-2030s. US EPA That transition is pushing the market toward A2L (mildly flammable, low-GWP) alternatives like R-32 and R-454B. Energy Codes

For facility teams, two priorities stand out:

(1) Safety, training & codes readiness

A2L refrigerants bring new safety nuances. Contractors and service teams must be trained, and local codes (leak detection, ventilation, charge limits) must be understood and enforced. Manufacturers are already shifting product lines to A2Ls to align with the 2025 compliance timelines. Energy Codes

(2) Leak management as carbon strategy

Refrigerant emissions are Scope 1 emissions—direct, onsite greenhouse gas releases that come from leaks, servicing losses, or disposal. ASHE Because many HFCs have very high global warming potentials (GWP) (often hundreds to thousands of times higher than CO₂)a pound of refrigerant lost can translate into a large carbon penalty. GHG Protocol

Legacy systems may lose 20–30% of their refrigerant charge over time without an obvious performance impact. U.S. General Services Administration These silent leaks are hidden carbon drains, often overlooked in efficiency planning.

5. From Projects to Performance

Retrofitting systems may win attention, but the real win in 2026 is locking in performance over time. Field studies and commissioning guides show that, without sustained monitoring and correction, buildings can lose 10–30 % of their efficiency gains within a few years, due to drift, sensor faults, coil fouling, or control logic degradation.

Enter Monitoring-Based Commissioning (MBCx) and Fault Detection & Diagnostics (FDD). These aren’t big capital projects—they’re everyday practices that keep systems efficient. Research from ASME shows that automated fault detection in RTUs and HVAC systems can cut significant energy waste.

In one office building study, trend analytics flagged simultaneous heating and cooling, broken economizers, and poor control sequencing. Once fixed, the building’s energy use dropped by 10%. The takeaway is simple: continuous monitoring finds waste fast, and fixing it pays off immediately.

What this means for facility leaders in 2026:

Move away from treating projects as one-and-done.
Build dashboards that track energy, ventilation, fan motor indices, and carbon in parallel.
Use automated alerts to flag deviations in real time.
Make MBCx + FDD the standard part of your operations budget—not a side project.

Utility bills stay low, carbon footprints shrink, and your buildings stay compliant and efficient—without waiting for the next big retrofit.

2026 rewards operators

In 2026, sustainability progress will come from strong day-to-day operations. Facility and energy managers who focus on performance standards, grid-smart scheduling, healthy air, refrigerant planning, and continuous monitoring will find they already have the tools to deliver real results.

The equipment in your building doesn’t need to change overnight. What matters is how it’s managed. Every optimized filter, tuned control, and well-timed ventilation cycle adds up, lowering carbon, controlling costs, and building resilience.

This is the year where facility operations show their true strength: turning routine decisions into measurable sustainability gains.

Why MERV 13 Filters May Be Straining Your HVAC & What to Do Instead

Ava Montini
Jul 31, 2025
3 min read

In the race to improve indoor air quality (IAQ), MERV 13 filters quickly became the default solution. Backed by ASHRAE recommendations and often mandated for LEED, WELL, and government-funded retrofits—particularly in schools and healthcare settings—they offer fine-particle capture down to 0.3 microns.

And the promise is compelling: better protection against smoke, allergens, pathogens, and pollution.

But what happens when a filter built for high capture also comes with high resistance?

That’s the overlooked issue facilities teams across North America have quietly (and not so quietly) been contending with since the industry-wide pivot to pleated MERV 13 filtration. And it’s exposing a critical gap between policy and practicality.

The Unseen Burden

Pressure Drop and System Strain

MERV 13 filters do deliver on filtration performance. But many commercial buildings weren’t designed with the added pressure resistance these filters introduce. Especially older or heritage buildings. This added strain reduces efficiency and risks long-term operational degradation, especially in decentralized HVAC systems like fan coil units, packaged rooftop units, and older RTUs.

Pressure drop, the measure of air resistance across a filter, directly influences fan performance, motor longevity, and energy consumption. As resistance rises, so does the system’s workload. What’s often missed in blanket retrofit strategies is that denser filters may clean more, but they also constrict more.

Common downstream effects include:

Fan overwork, leading to overheating or premature failure
Uneven airflow, resulting in occupant discomfort
Shorter filter lifespan, increasing maintenance load
Higher energy bills, due to compensating fans or longer run times

Peer-reviewed research and government data confirm the operational penalties tied to high-resistance filtration.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, when HVAC systems are not recalibrated or upgraded during a filter retrofit, increased static pressure can lead to a 20–30% rise in fan energy consumption, as fans work harder to maintain airflow under greater resistance.
A study presented at the ASHRAE IAQ 2013 conference by Zaatari, Siegel, and Novoselac found that rooftop HVAC units experienced airflow reductions of up to 10% when upgrading from MERV 8 to MERV 13 filters, largely due to increased pressure drop across the filter.
In its 2024 Filtration and Air Cleaning Position Document, ASHRAE confirms that increasing filter efficiency (e.g., upgrading to MERV 13 or higher) generally results in higher pressure drop, which can reduce airflow or increase energy consumption—especially in systems not originally designed to accommodate high-efficiency filters.

Despite this, many upgrades were executed rapidly, driven by pandemic urgency and available funding, and not necessarily by holistic HVAC engineering.

Rethinking the Role of the Filter

Not all MERV 13 filters are created equal.

It’s a common misconception that achieving high filtration efficiency must come at the cost of system performance. But advancements in filter design have shown that it’s possible to meet rigorous indoor air quality standards without overburdening HVAC systems.

Instead of relying solely on dense mechanical media that increase resistance, some technologies, such as Blade Air's Pro Filter, use innovative methods, such as electrostatic attraction, to capture fine and ultrafine particles more efficiently.

The benefits of low-pressure filtration approaches are clear:

Significantly reduced pressure drop, preserving system balance and efficiency
More consistent airflow, even in legacy or decentralized HVAC configurations
Lower energy consumption, due to decreased fan effort
Extended equipment life, with reduced strain on motors and fans
Sustainability gains, with designs that prioritize reusability and waste reduction

As building standards continue to evolve, it's worth reexamining whether the filter in use supports both compliance and long-term operational resilience.

Why Low-Pressure Filtration is Gaining Momentum

Facilities professionals today are tasked with a complex balancing act: maintaining high indoor air quality, advancing energy efficiency, extending equipment lifespan, and meeting evolving occupant expectations, all within constrained budgets.

Yet compliance alone isn’t enough. A filter that meets regulatory standards on paper may still introduce performance issues if it exceeds the mechanical limits of an existing HVAC system.

That’s why low-pressure filtration is gaining traction—not as a compromise but as a more strategic path forward.

These next-generation filtration approaches help building operators:

Avoid costly system redesigns or equipment upgrades
Reduce the frequency of service disruptions and maintenance interventions
Advance broader environmental and ESG goals through energy and waste reductions

Most importantly, they restore decision-making power to facilities teams, offering workable options instead of one-size-fits-all mandates.

Rethinking Retrofit Outcomes

If your facility has seen a rise in operational issues following a filtration upgrade, such as higher energy bills, comfort complaints, or premature equipment wear, you’re not imagining it. These are increasingly recognized as widespread challenges linked to high-resistance filters.

But the solution doesn’t necessarily require reengineering your system.

It starts with reexamining the filter itself, and whether it truly supports the way your building functions.

Because in high-performing buildings, air quality solutions should enhance operations, not compromise them.

Insights Hub

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur