top of page

AI, Grid Stress, and the Rising Cost of Cooling

Discover how AI-driven data centers are reshaping electricity demand, prices, and why smarter HVAC and efficiency are critical for sustainable growth.

Ava Montini

Feb 24, 2026

Written by 

Published on

Tags

How artificial intelligence is reshaping electricity markets and redefining efficiency inside data centers and real estate portfolios


Across North America, electricity load forecasts are being revised upward as hyperscale campuses, colocation expansions, and AI clusters come online. Grid operators are responding to a new reality: computing growth is accelerating faster than generation and transmission capacity.



Global data center electricity consumption could reach 1,000 terawatt-hours annually by 2030, roughly equivalent to the annual consumption of Japan. In the United States, PJM Interconnection has reported a sharp increase in capacity auction prices as new large-load customers, including AI-driven data centers, enter the interconnection queue.


Goldman Sachs forecasts a 175% surge in global data center power demand by 2030, a significant upward revision driven by the rapid adoption of AI infrastructure and intensive GPU requirements. This surge is expected to raise data centers’ share of U.S. electricity consumption to approximately 8% and contribute to a 10–15% increase in European power demand over the next decade.


AI Workloads Are Structurally Different



Previous digital expansion cycles, including early cloud adoption, drove steady and predictable growth. AI changes the profile of demand.


Training large language models requires sustained, high-density compute over extended periods. Inference activity multiplies that demand across millions of daily interactions. Rack densities are climbing. Thermal loads are intensifying. Mechanical systems are operating closer to their performance limits for longer durations.


Higher density translates directly into greater airflow sensitivity and tighter thermal tolerances. Small inefficiencies that were once negligible now compound materially across 8,760 operating hours per year.


Cooling Is a Major Line Item, Not a Support Function


In many modern facilities, mechanical systems account for 30 to 40 percent of total site energy consumption. That includes chillers, pumps, CRAH and CRAC units, and most consistently, fans.


Fan energy is particularly sensitive to system resistance. Based on affinity laws, fan power scales approximately with the cube of airflow. As static pressure increases, required fan energy rises disproportionately. Even modest increases in resistance can translate into meaningful increases in kilowatt draw.

Filtration is one of the most persistent contributors to system resistance. As filters load or when they have a high baseline pressure drop, fans compensate continuously. This is not a temporary event. It is a compounding operational penalty.


For a 20-megawatt data center, cooling and mechanical systems often account for 30 to 40 percent of total facility energy use. That equates to roughly 6 to 8 megawatts dedicated to cooling infrastructure.


Even modest efficiency improvements at this scale are financially meaningful. A 5 percent reduction in cooling-related fan energy would reduce load by approximately 300 to 400 kilowatts. At an electricity price of $0.10 per kilowatt-hour, that translates to roughly $260,000 to $350,000 in annual energy cost savings, before considering demand charges or capacity pricing exposure.

In regions with constrained supply or rising capacity costs, the economic value of that reduction increases further.


Grid Stress Is Changing the Economics of Efficiency


Electricity markets are tightening in regions experiencing concentrated data center growth. Capacity auctions in PJM have reflected the strain of new large-load interconnection requests. Transmission upgrades require time. Generation additions face permitting and capital constraints.


As reserve margins narrow, price volatility increases. Capacity charges, peak demand pricing, and long-term power purchase agreements are becoming more complex and more expensive.


For data center operators, efficiency becomes a hedge against volatility. Each kilowatt not consumed reduces exposure to price swings and capacity premiums. For REITs with diversified portfolios, it strengthens net operating income resilience across properties facing similar market pressures.

Scope 2 emissions reporting adds another layer of accountability. Institutional investors increasingly evaluate carbon intensity alongside operating performance. Mechanical efficiency directly influences both.

Energy savings are no longer incremental improvements. They are risk mitigation tools.


Designing for AI Without Expanding Energy Budgets


The strategic response does not require speculative technology. It requires disciplined optimization of existing systems.


Three priorities stand out:


1. Reduce persistent static pressure

Airflow resistance accumulates silently over time. Low-pressure, high-efficiency filtration technologies reduce baseline resistance while maintaining particulate capture performance. This lowers continuous fan energy and protects downstream equipment.


2. Optimize thermal management architecture

Variable-speed fans, containment strategies, and calibrated ventilation align airflow with actual load rather than worst-case assumptions. This stabilizes thermal performance under higher rack densities.


3. Institutionalize monitoring-based commissioning

Continuous diagnostics prevent efficiency drift. Small degradations in airflow or heat exchange are corrected before they become embedded in long-term energy profiles.



The Competitive Advantage of Thermodynamic Discipline


Artificial intelligence will continue to expand electricity demand. That trajectory is supported by credible projections from global energy authorities and financial institutions. The constraint is not computing ambition. It is infrastructure capacity.

Facilities that treat thermodynamic efficiency as core infrastructure rather than as an ancillary optimization will outperform in this environment. Lower static pressure, calibrated airflow, and disciplined mechanical management translate directly into reduced exposure to grid stress and electricity price escalation.

The economics are clear. As AI reshapes the demand curve, cooling efficiency becomes one of the most controllable variables in an increasingly uncontrollable market.


Data centers are powering intelligence.

Efficiency will determine who powers it profitably.

Understanding CADR for Air Purifiers

  • Writer: Jennifer Crowley
    Jennifer Crowley
  • Jul 30, 2023
  • 2 min read

Updated: Jul 9, 2024

3-D Illustration of the Blade Air office floorplan
The CADR rating is essential in determining an air purifier’s effectiveness and helps consumers compare the performance of models and brands, making it easier to find an air purifier that will meet their needs.

With the growing concern over indoor air pollution, air purifiers have become an increasingly popular appliance in many homes. However, with so many options on the market, choosing the right air purifier can take time and effort. In addition, consumers are often faced with various specifications, features, and marketing claims, making it difficult to compare different models and determine the best fit for their needs. One key factor that can help differentiate air purifiers and make the decision-making process easier is understanding the Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) rating.


This blog will explore CADR and how it can help you choose the right air purifier for your indoor space.


What is CADR

Clean Air Delivery Rate, or CADR, is a widely recognized benchmark established by the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) in the United States. This independent organization certifies and verifies the performance of air purifiers through CADR testing, ensuring that the manufacturer’s claims are accurate. This makes it easier for consumers to identify which air purifiers are the most effective in removing indoor air pollutants like dust, pollen, and smoke.

CADR evaluates the performance of an air purifier based on the amount of clean air it produces per minute and the size of the room it is intended to be used in.


CADR Certification

Air purifiers with an AHAM-verified CADR rating are tested using a standardized method. According to AHAM, a CADR figure is tested through a standardized method in a test chamber with a volume of 1,008 cubic feet. As the tested air purifier runs at full speed, the amount of dust, pollen, and smoke contaminants is continuously monitored. The air purifier’s CADR rating is calculated based on how long a unit takes to purify the air.


Understanding Why CADR for Air Purifiers is Important

The CADR rating is essential in determining an air purifier’s effectiveness. It helps consumers compare the performance of different models and brands, making it easier to find an air purifier that will meet their specific needs. For example, air purifiers with higher CADR ratings will be able to clean the air in a space more quickly than models with a lower CADR rating.


‘The higher the CADR, the better the performance.’


In addition to a CADR rating, here is a short list of the areas we recommend you consider when buying an air purifier:

  1. Filter efficiency, size and amount of filter media

  2. Noise level

  3. Motor quality

  4. No ozone

  5. Square Foot Area coverage

Explore expert insights, stay up-to-date with industry events, and gain a deeper understanding of the developments shaping the built environment.

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter below for exclusive early access to Blade's Insights content.

Insights Hub

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

bottom of page