top of page

2026 Sustainability Trends Every Facility Manager Needs to Know

Discover the top 5 sustainability trends facility managers need to know in 2026—from performance standards to IAQ, refrigerants, and more.

Ava Montini

Jan 20, 2026

Written by 

Published on

Tags

A new year, new pressures


For facility and energy managers, 2026 is not just another lap around the operations cycle. The stakes are rising across the built environment: carbon targets are evolving from voluntary goals to enforceable standards, utility grids are growing more dynamic, and your systems are being asked to deliver more than comfort—they’re being asked to demonstrate climate performance.


This change comes at a moment when global energy demand is accelerating. In 2024, energy demand rose 2.2% globally (faster than the decade-long average), while electricity demand jumped 4.3%, driven by electrification, extreme weather, and digital growth. IEA In the buildings sector alone, electricity use increased by over 600 TWh (5%), accounting for nearly 60% of total growth in global electricity use. IEA Blob Storage And forecasts suggest this upward trend will continue: the U.S. Energy Information Administration projects that global energy consumption will grow through 2050, outpacing efficiency gains unless stronger policies intervene. EIA


The challenge is that these changes don’t arrive all at once or in obvious ways. They show up gradually—through updated codes, shifting tariffs, new equipment standards, and increasing expectations from tenants and investors. The upside is that facility and energy managers, once working mostly behind the scenes, are now central to turning sustainability commitments into measurable results.


Here are five sustainability trends shaping 2026, and why each matters for the decisions you’ll make in your mechanical rooms, dashboards, and boardrooms.


1. Building Performance Standards Move from Paper to Practice

A decade ago, sustainability reporting was a quarterly or annual exercise filed internally or sent to corporate. Today, Building Performance Standards (BPS) are shifting that paradigm: they tie a building’s actual energy use and emissions to regulatory thresholds, making performance more than just a nice-to-have.


Across the U.S., BPS and similar mandates now exist in nine localities and three states, with penalties or compliance mechanisms for underperforming buildings. (ACEEE) In Canada, cities like Vancouver have already adopted performance standards, and other municipalities are actively exploring similar rules. (Efficiency Canada) Natural Resources Canada also recognizes that BPS policies enable jurisdictions to regulate energy or emissions in existing buildings. (Natural Resources Canada)


Europe is several steps ahead. Through the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, member states are required to set minimum energy performance standards for existing buildings and align them with long-term decarbonization goals. That trajectory suggests North America is likely to follow a similar path, with more cities and provinces phasing in binding performance requirements over the next decade.


For facility teams, this is a shift in mindset: hitting a design target isn’t enough. What matters now is day-to-day performance. Keeping HVAC systems tuned, filters low-pressure, ventilation right-sized, and carbon data tracked continuously.


Treat compliance not as a one-off capital project, but as a persistent operations program. Teams that build strong discipline in data, trending, and low-cost O&M measures (filter swaps, economizer tuning, drift checks) will free up budget (and carbon headroom) to take on higher-stakes retrofits later.


2. Grid-interactive buildings become the norm

The grid you’re tied into is no longer a fixed backdrop. It’s dynamic. As renewables rise, carbon intensity swings hour by hour. In many regions, the grid’s carbon intensity can vary by over 1,000 g CO₂/kWh between low and high hours. EnergyTag


This variability is why hourly accounting, not annual averages, is becoming the standard: studies find that relying solely on yearly emission factors can bias carbon inventories by as much as 35 %, especially in areas with high grid variability. itspubs.ucdavis.edu


For facility managers, your job isn’t just to reduce consumption, but rather to shift it. Running air handlers or pushing large loads at 3 p.m. on a carbon-intensive grid can erase much of the value of your efficiency gains. But shifting that same load to cleaner hours can multiply your CO₂e savings.


Buildings that provide demand flexibility (the ability to curtail, shift, or modulate loads) not only ease grid stress but also help integrate renewables and reduce emissions. ScienceDirect The U.S. DOE’s Grid-Interactive Efficient Buildings (GEB) initiative explicitly frames buildings as potential distributed energy resources (DERs) that can respond to grid signals. The Department of Energy's Energy


Facilities that align their systems with grid conditions will capture more carbon value, reduce costs, and position themselves for utility incentives and grid services.


3. Indoor Air Quality and Energy Are No Longer Trade-Offs

The pandemic showed that “just add more outside air” is not a sustainable strategy. It drove home the fact that healthier air doesn’t have to mean higher energy bills. In 2023, ASHRAE Standard 241 introduced the concept of Equivalent Clean Airflow (ECAi): a performance-based framework that lets you meet air quality targets with the right combination of ventilation, filtration, and air cleaning instead of defaulting to maximum outdoor air. (ASHRAE)


This matters even more in 2026 because the carbon penalty of over-ventilation is steep. Conditioning excess outside air can account for a significant share of building energy use, especially in regions with temperature or humidity extremes. U.S. EPA modelling has shown that raising outdoor air rates from 5 to 20 cfm per person can sharply increase HVAC energy costs, depending on the climate and system type. (EPA)


The opportunity is to deliver the same (or better) air quality at a lower energy cost. Low-pressure, high-efficiency filtration plays a central role here. Studies show that filter design, not just MERV rating, dictates pressure drop and energy impact. Well-engineered filters with optimized media and geometry can deliver higher capture efficiency at lower resistance than standard pleated filters, reducing fan energy while still supporting ASHRAE 241 clean-air goals. (ScienceDirect)


The play in 2026: pair low-pressure filtration with calibrated demand-controlled ventilation (DCV) and proven air cleaning technologies. Together, they provide safe indoor air with the lowest possible energy penalty. IAQ and carbon goals don’t have to compete. They can reinforce each other when filtration efficiency and system pressure are managed by design.


4. Refrigerant rules shift the replacement playbook

If you’re spec’ing new HVAC or refrigeration equipment in 2026, refrigerant selection matters just as much as capacity. Under the U.S. AIM Act, the EPA is phasing down production and consumption of high-GWP HFCs—aiming to cut them to just 15% of historic baseline levels by mid-2030s. US EPA That transition is pushing the market toward A2L (mildly flammable, low-GWP) alternatives like R-32 and R-454B. Energy Codes


For facility teams, two priorities stand out:


(1) Safety, training & codes readiness

A2L refrigerants bring new safety nuances. Contractors and service teams must be trained, and local codes (leak detection, ventilation, charge limits) must be understood and enforced. Manufacturers are already shifting product lines to A2Ls to align with the 2025 compliance timelines. Energy Codes


(2) Leak management as carbon strategy

Refrigerant emissions are Scope 1 emissions—direct, onsite greenhouse gas releases that come from leaks, servicing losses, or disposal. ASHE Because many HFCs have very high global warming potentials (GWP) (often hundreds to thousands of times higher than CO₂)a pound of refrigerant lost can translate into a large carbon penalty. GHG Protocol


Legacy systems may lose 20–30% of their refrigerant charge over time without an obvious performance impact. U.S. General Services Administration These silent leaks are hidden carbon drains, often overlooked in efficiency planning.


5. From Projects to Performance

Retrofitting systems may win attention, but the real win in 2026 is locking in performance over time. Field studies and commissioning guides show that, without sustained monitoring and correction, buildings can lose 10–30 % of their efficiency gains within a few years, due to drift, sensor faults, coil fouling, or control logic degradation.


Enter Monitoring-Based Commissioning (MBCx) and Fault Detection & Diagnostics (FDD). These aren’t big capital projects—they’re everyday practices that keep systems efficient. Research from ASME shows that automated fault detection in RTUs and HVAC systems can cut significant energy waste.


In one office building study, trend analytics flagged simultaneous heating and cooling, broken economizers, and poor control sequencing. Once fixed, the building’s energy use dropped by 10%. The takeaway is simple: continuous monitoring finds waste fast, and fixing it pays off immediately.


What this means for facility leaders in 2026:

  • Move away from treating projects as one-and-done.

  • Build dashboards that track energy, ventilation, fan motor indices, and carbon in parallel.

  • Use automated alerts to flag deviations in real time.

  • Make MBCx + FDD the standard part of your operations budget—not a side project.


Utility bills stay low, carbon footprints shrink, and your buildings stay compliant and efficient—without waiting for the next big retrofit.


2026 rewards operators

In 2026, sustainability progress will come from strong day-to-day operations. Facility and energy managers who focus on performance standards, grid-smart scheduling, healthy air, refrigerant planning, and continuous monitoring will find they already have the tools to deliver real results.


The equipment in your building doesn’t need to change overnight. What matters is how it’s managed. Every optimized filter, tuned control, and well-timed ventilation cycle adds up, lowering carbon, controlling costs, and building resilience.


This is the year where facility operations show their true strength: turning routine decisions into measurable sustainability gains.

MERV 13 vs HEPA Filter: How Are They Different?

  • Writer: Jennifer Crowley
    Jennifer Crowley
  • Jul 28, 2023
  • 3 min read

Updated: Jul 9, 2024

Cropped images of a pleated filter (MEV 13) and a HEPA filter, one on top of the other, to create one image
Both MERV 13 and HEPA filters are designed to remove pollutants from the air; however, there are some key differences between them including cost, fit and airflow.

Air filters are a vital component in maintaining good indoor air quality. Two of the most commonly used air filters are MERV 13 filters and HEPA filters. Both types of filters are designed to remove pollutants from the air; however, there are some key differences between them.

Illustration comparing the particle capture of MERV , 10 and 13 filters
The higher a filter’s MERV rating, the more effective it is at capturing airborne particles.

What are MERV 13 filters?

All traditional air filters are differentiated according to their MERV (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value) rating. The higher a filter’s MERV rating, the more effective it is at capturing airborne particles. MERV 13 and below are considered HVAC-system-grade filters for residential, commercial and general hospital use.


MERV 13 filters can filter particles closer to 0.3 microns in size, which includes contaminants such as pollen, mould, dust, bacteria, pet dander, smoke and virus carriers. MERV 13 filters are typically used in residential and commercial HVAC systems to improve indoor air quality.


What are HEPA filters?

On the other hand, HEPA filters are considered the most efficient air filters available. HEPA stands for High-Efficiency Particulate Air and has a rating of MERV 17 or higher. HEPA filters are designed to remove 99.97% of particles that are 0.3 microns or larger in size; This includes particles such as smoke, bacteria, and viruses.


Since HEPA filters are so efficient, they cause a higher pressure drop than filters with MERV ratings. Given their high efficiency, HEPA filters are best suited for rooms where air quality is a concern, such as in hospitals, laboratories, and cleanrooms.


Many ventilation systems are not designed for HEPA, but these filters are available as portable air cleaners or vacuum cleaners and can be used in homes to improve indoor air quality, particularly for people with allergies or respiratory issues.


MERV 13 vs HEPA Filter: How Are They Different?

14 Pleated HVAC filters standing side by side as if on a bookshelf
MERV 13 filters can capture particles as small as 0.3 microns.

Pros of MERV 13 Filters:

  1. Cost: Affordable and easy to find.

  2. High Efficiency: MERV 13 filters can capture particles as small as 0.3 microns, making them highly effective at removing pollutants such as dust, pet dander, pollen, and even some bacteria and viruses from the air.


Cons of MERV 13 Filters:

  1. Filter Efficiency: Not as effective as HEPA filters in removing the smallest and most harmful particles.

  2. Maintenance: MERV 13 filters may need to be replaced more frequently than lower MERV-rated filters, which can add to the overall cost and maintenance of the HVAC system.

  3. Compatibility: MERV 13 filters may not be compatible with all HVAC systems, and using a filter that is too efficient for a system can cause damage. Before using a MERV 13 filter, it is important to check if the HVAC system can handle the filter’s efficiency and pressure drop.

Photo of a free standing HEPA Filter
HEPA filters are extremely effective at removing pollutants, including smoke, bacteria, and viruses.

Pros of HEPA Filters:

  1. High efficiency: HEPA filters are highly efficient at trapping small particles, such as dust, pollen, and pet dander. Extremely effective at removing pollutants, including smoke, bacteria, and viruses.

  2. Long lifespan: HEPA filters are designed to last a long time, so they do not need to be replaced as frequently as other filters.



Cons of using a HEPA filter in an HVAC system include:

  1. High cost: HEPA filters can be more expensive than other types of filters, which can make them a less cost-effective option for some people.

  2. Decreased airflow: HEPA filters can reduce airflow through a standard HVAC system, which can make it less energy efficient and increase the amount of time it takes to heat or cool a room.

  3. Need for professional installation: HEPA filters are typically larger and more complex than other types of filters, which means they may need to be installed by a professional.


In conclusion, both MERV 13 and HEPA filters effectively improve indoor air quality, but they have different pros and cons depending on the setting and the level of air purity required. MERV 13 filters are more affordable and easy to find and effectively remove a wide range of pollutants. HEPA filters are extremely effective at removing pollutants, but they are more expensive and can be more difficult to find.


It’s also important to consult a professional to determine the most appropriate filter for your setting, MERV 13 vs HEPA, as the filter type and frequency of replacement can vary depending on the size and usage of the space, as well as the type of pollutants present in the air.

Explore expert insights, stay up-to-date with industry events, and gain a deeper understanding of the developments shaping the built environment.

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter below for exclusive early access to Blade's Insights content.

Insights Hub

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

bottom of page