top of page

Flu Season Meets School Season: How Smarter Air Quality Keeps Classrooms Healthy

Every fall, classrooms fill with students—and viruses. Discover how smarter air quality strategies like low-resistance filtration, ventilation, and HEPA keep schools healthier, reduce absences, and support better learning outcomes.

Ava Montini

Aug 19, 2025

Written by 

Published on

Tags

The scene every September

Every September, the school bell rings and hallways come alive again. But as backpacks and lunch boxes make their way back into classrooms, another unwelcome guest tends to sneak in too: flu season.


Teachers know it all too well. The cough that spreads from desk to desk, the hand sanitizer bottles running low by mid-morning, the spike in absenteeism that leaves lesson plans hanging. Parents know it when the inevitable call from the school office comes: “Your child has a fever, please come pick them up.”


It’s a cycle we’ve come to accept as part of the school year. But what if healthier air could help change that story?


Why flu season and school season collide

Respiratory viruses (including influenza) spread more readily indoors, where exhaled particles accumulate. That’s not speculative; CDC/NIOSH is unambiguous that better indoor ventilation reduces occupants’ overall exposure to airborne viruses. CDC


We also know influenza isn’t only about big droplets from a sneeze. People exhale infectious virus in fine aerosols during normal breathing and speaking, which can linger and travel within a room. That was demonstrated in a landmark study that detected infectious influenza virus in exhaled breath from symptomatic adults, no cough required. PNASNature


The drier, colder air from the fall and winter cause low humidity, helping influenza survive and transmit more efficiently. Put simply: when we bring students back into dry, tightly sealed buildings, small airborne particles build up and stay infectious longer. That’s the fixable part.


Think of clean classroom air as a budget with three line items:

  1. Dilute what’s in the room (ventilation/outdoor air)

  2. Remove what’s in the room (filtration/air cleaning)

  3. Disable what’s in the room (UVGI where appropriate)

The key is using them together, sized to the space, and tuned to the school day.


What the standards now say and why it matters

Before the pandemic, most schools designed ventilation systems mainly for comfort—things like controlling odours or keeping CO₂ levels down—not for stopping the spread of illness.


That changed with ASHRAE’s new Standard 241, which focuses specifically on infection control. ASHRAE’s Standard 241: Control of Infectious Aerosols changes the target by introducing Equivalent Clean Airflow (ECA)—a flexible, additive way to hit a per-person clean air goal using any combination of ventilation, filtration, and proven air cleaning. That means a classroom can meet its target by mixing outdoor air with high-efficiency filters, HEPA units, and/or UVGI, rather than relying on outdoor air alone. ASHRAE+1


In parallel, CDC/NIOSH and EPA emphasize practical steps for schools: keep systems maintained, upgrade to MERV-13 or better where equipment allows, and supplement with portable HEPA when central systems can’t carry the whole load. CDC+1Environmental Protection Agency


The evidence that this keeps kids in class

  • In a study of 162 California elementary school classrooms, illness-related absences dropped by 1.6% for every extra 1 l/s‑person of ventilation. Increasing ventilation to meet the state standard (7.1 l/s‑person) from the average (4 l/s‑person) could reduce absences by 3.4%, gain $33 million annually in attendance-based funding, while costing just $4 million more in energy.

  • A study across Washington and Idaho found that a 1,000 ppm increase in indoor CO₂ correlated with a 0.5–0.9% drop in average daily attendance, translating into a 10–20% rise in student absences.

  • In controlled environments, each 500 ppm rise in CO₂ resulted in 1.4–1.8% slower response times, along with a 2.1–2.4% lower throughput on cognitive tasks.

  • Harvard’s COGfx study revealed that building occupants in green-certified, well-ventilated environments scored, on average, 101% higher in cognitive tests than those in conventional buildings. 


“Will MERV-13 break my units?” (The energy/airflow reality)

The honest answer: it depends on the filter you pick and your fan capacity. Research on rooftop units shows that moving from MERV-8 to MERV-13/14 can raise cooling-mode energy use by a few percent if the filter adds a lot of resistance, or it can reduce airflow if the fan can’t keep up. That’s why filter selection matters as much as efficiency.


Not all MERV-13 filters are created equal. Traditional pleated designs often create a higher pressure drop, forcing HVAC systems to work harder and sometimes leading to performance issues. But newer filtration technologies (explicitly engineered for low resistance at high efficiency, like Blade Air's Pro Filter,) are changing that equation. By combining advanced media with optimized form factors, these filters deliver MERV-13 (and higher) performance without the heavy airflow penalty.


California’s Title 24 research reinforces this point: Many modern low-pressure MERV-13 options can maintain pressure drops under 0.20 in. w.c., keeping systems within safe operating ranges. That means schools can improve air quality, meet public health guidance, and stay compliant without sacrificing system efficiency or longevity.


When you factor in the bigger picture—fewer student absences, better cognitive performance, and improved overall school operations—the ROI clearly tilts toward upgrading. Healthier air doesn’t just protect occupants; it protects the bottom line.


How this translates into a classroom target (the ECA idea)

ASHRAE 241’s Equivalent Clean Airflow lets you add up all the ways you’re cleaning air—outdoor air, central filtration, HEPA, UVGI—until you reach the per-occupant target for your space type. It’s flexible, measurable, and avoids unrealistic demands for 100% outdoor air in cold snaps. ASHRAE

A practical approach:

  • Estimate your current outdoor air (from design or testing).

  • Add the “clean air” from MERV-13 upgrades (using published efficiencies) and from each HEPA unit’s clean air delivery rate.

  • If the sum doesn’t meet the ECA target, add another portable unit or rethink your filtration strategy. ASHRAE


What about measurement and transparency?


CO₂ for ventilation

Track a few representative rooms across grade levels and building wings. Persistently high readings during class point to areas needing a fix (dampers, schedules, or supplemental air cleaning). Health Canada’s 1000 ppm residential benchmark is a useful anchor for conversations with families and staff. Canada.ca


PM₂.₅ for smoke days

A couple of low-drift sensors at kid-height in hallways or problem rooms can confirm your filtration strategy keeps indoor levels below outdoors during wildfire events. Health Canada and EPA both recommend this principle. Canada.ca


Bottom line

Flu season doesn’t have to mean higher absence rates and strained HVAC systems. The most effective path is a consistent program: keep ventilation tuned, use filters that balance efficiency with low resistance, and supplement with portable HEPA or UVGI where it makes sense.

Exploring the Differences Between Mechanical and Natural Ventilation

  • Writer: Jennifer Crowley
    Jennifer Crowley
  • Jul 31, 2023
  • 3 min read

Updated: Jul 9, 2024

Four rooftop ventilation units emerging from a building roof
In practice, most buildings utilize a combination of both natural and mechanical ventilation systems to balance the pros and cons and achieve optimal Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) and thermal comfort.

Mechanical and Natural ventilation are two different methods for introducing fresh air into a building or space. Both have their own benefits and drawbacks, and the appropriate choice will depend on the specific needs of the space being ventilated.


Mechanical ventilation involves using mechanical means, such as fans and ductwork, to bring fresh air into a space. This type of ventilation is often used in buildings with no windows or spaces where natural ventilation is insufficient. One advantage of mechanical ventilation is that it can be precisely controlled, allowing for precise regulation of temperature, humidity, and air quality. It is also a good option for spaces that need to be kept at a specific temperature or humidity level, such as hospitals or laboratories.


However, mechanical ventilation can be expensive to install and maintain and requires a reliable power source. It can also be noisy, which may be a concern in certain settings.


On the other hand, natural ventilation relies on the movement of air through open windows, doors, or vents to bring fresh air into a space. This type of ventilation is often used in residential buildings and other spaces where windows and doors can be opened to allow air circulation. One advantage of natural ventilation is that it is generally less expensive to install and maintain than mechanical ventilation. It is also typically quieter than mechanical ventilation, as it does not involve mechanical fans or other equipment.


However, natural ventilation is less precise than mechanical ventilation and may not be suitable for spaces that require a specific temperature or humidity level. It is also not ideal for areas that do not have windows or other openings that can be used to bring in fresh air.


Natural ventilation and mechanical ventilation are both methods of controlling the airflow within a building, but they have some key differences in terms of their benefits and drawbacks.

Pros of natural ventilation:

  1. Energy efficient: Natural ventilation systems do not require the use of mechanical equipment, which means they consume less energy and have a lower environmental impact.

  2. Cost-effective: Natural ventilation systems typically have lower upfront costs than mechanical systems and may also have lower maintenance costs over time.

  3. Improved indoor air quality: Natural ventilation helps remove stale indoor air and bring in fresh outdoor air, improving the overall air quality within a building.


Cons of natural ventilation:

  1. Dependent on the weather: The effectiveness of natural ventilation systems can be affected by the weather and may not function as well during periods of high heat, humidity, or low winds.

  2. Limited control: It can be challenging to control and regulate airflow in a natural ventilation system, which can result in uneven temperature and air quality in different parts of a building.

  3. Site and architecture-specific: Natural ventilation might not be suitable for all buildings, especially in urban or high-rise areas or extreme weather conditions, as a well-designed natural ventilation system must be integrated into the architecture and design of the building.


Pros of mechanical ventilation:

  1. Climate independence: Mechanical ventilation systems can operate regardless of weather conditions and provide consistent airflow and temperature control.

  2. Greater control: Mechanical systems can be designed and controlled to provide a specific level of airflow, temperature and humidity, allowing for better indoor environmental quality control.

  3. Suitable for any building type: Mechanical systems can be installed in any building and can be designed to suit the specific needs of the building.


Cons of mechanical ventilation:

  1. Higher energy consumption: Mechanical systems consume energy to power the mechanical equipment needed to circulate air, making them less energy efficient than natural ventilation systems.

  2. Higher upfront costs: Mechanical ventilation systems tend to have higher upfront costs than natural systems and more regular maintenance costs.


In practice, most buildings utilize a combination of both natural and mechanical ventilation systems to balance the pros and cons and achieve optimal Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) and thermal comfort.


In summary, both mechanical ventilation and natural ventilation have their own advantages and drawbacks, and the appropriate choice will depend on the specific needs of the space being ventilated. Mechanical ventilation is generally more precise and can be used to maintain specific temperature and humidity levels, but it is more expensive and requires a reliable power source. Natural ventilation is generally less expensive and quieter, but it is less precise and may not be suitable for certain spaces.

Explore expert insights, stay up to date with industry events, and gain a deeper understanding of the cutting-edge developments that are revolutionizing the indoor air quality landscape within Blade Air's comprehensive Insights Hub.

You can also subscribe to our monthly newsletter below for exclusive early access to Blade's Insights content, uncovering tomorrow's air quality advancements before they hit our Hub.

Insights Hub

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

bottom of page