Facility Changes That Drive 80% of Emissions Savings

The overlooked 20% of building strategies can deliver 80% of emissions savings. Here’s how to reset your 2026 baseline.

Ava Montini

Jan 6, 2026

Written by

Published on

The 80/20 Pattern in Building Decarbonization

In business, the Pareto principle (the idea that 20% of actions create 80% of results) shows up everywhere. It also applies to the way buildings decarbonize.

Most portfolios still treat carbon reduction as a capital-projects problem: new chillers, new boilers, new equipment. These projects are visible, expensive, and easy to headline in ESG reports. But in practice, the biggest near-term gains lie in the systems that are already running every hour of every day.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, space heating, cooling, and ventilation are among the top energy end-uses in commercial buildings, with ventilation alone consuming nearly 10% of the total building energy. Factor in heating and cooling, and the air systems you already own set the floor for your emissions profile. Industry surveys and guidance reinforce this point: HVAC systems consistently account for approximately 40% of energy use in commercial facilities. A share that shifts by climate zone but remains dominant across the board.

Before you buy new megawatts, make the watts you already use travel a shorter, smarter, more efficient path.

Filtration as a carbon multiplier (not a consumable line item)

Why filtration matters for energy (and CO₂e)

Filters impose a pressure drop; fans work against that resistance. Basic fan/affinity laws tell us that pressure rises with the square of fan speed, and fan power typically scales with pressure/flow requirements. Therefore, adding resistance increases fan energy unless the system compensates by reducing the flow.

On variable-speed systems that maintain flow, peer-reviewed work shows roughly linear fan-power response to added system pressure: a 10% rise in total pressure drop ≈ 10% rise in fan electric power (assumes fan and motor efficiencies roughly constant at operating point). CaEE

Field and lab studies show that higher filter resistance reduces supply airflow and can increase total power (especially as filters load), degrading cooling capacity and forcing longer runtimes. Newer research also documents the compounding effects of filter loading, with heavy clogging cutting net supply airflow by >30%, a textbook example of invisible energy waste. ScienceDirect

Moving up in MERV doesn’t automatically mean higher energy costs. Well-designed filters use optimized media and geometry (like deeper pleats or more surface area) to keep airflow resistance low. Studies have shown that these higher-efficiency filters can have a lower pressure drop than inexpensive MERV 8 pleated filters, especially when systems are properly balanced. In other words, it’s the filter’s pressure profile that matters, not just the MERV number. ScienceDirect

If you can lower your filter pressure drop while maintaining or improving capture, you directly reduce continuous fan energy. One of the few all-hours loads in many facilities. Because fans run whenever you condition or ventilate space, these savings translate cleanly into CO₂e reductions (see Section 5 for the math).

Demand-Controlled Ventilation (DCV)

What DCV does

It modulates outside-air intake based on occupancy (CO₂, people-count, scheduling) to avoid conditioning empty spaces. Codes and standards increasingly require or encourage DCV in high-occupancy areas, with ASHRAE 62.1 updates clarifying when and how ventilation turndown is permitted (including addenda that allow reduction to zero OA during verified unoccupied periods in certain space types). ASHRAE

Across building types and climates, published work shows that DCV control logic achieves ~9–33% HVAC energy savings. Advanced rooftop-unit control packages, which incorporate multi-speed/variable fans, DCV, and smarter economizer control, have delivered double-digit fan and cooling savings, sometimes exceeding 20%. Taylor & Francis Online

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) analyses flag that cost-effectiveness depends on the baseline over-ventilation and occupancy patterns; if your current minimums are already close to code, savings shrink. That’s a guidance feature, not a flaw—the point is to measure your baseline VRs before projecting benefits. Energy Technologies Area

DCV is a surgical lever: attack over-ventilation where it exists, prove reductions with trend data, and lock in permanent load reductions; especially valuable in heating-dominated regions where conditioning outside air is expensive in both energy and CO₂e. Energy Codes Guide

Preventative Maintenance

Controls drift, coils foul, dampers stick, sensors mis-calibrate—quietly taxing 5–15% of portfolio energy in many studies. Modern fault detection & diagnostics (FDD) tools and structured maintenance programs quickly recapture that waste. NREL Docs

Coil fouling: Government and academic sources document material energy penalties from dirty coils; some guidance cites compressor energy up to ~30% higher with fouled condensers (case and climate dependent). Even conservative findings confirm meaningful efficiency and capacity degradation. Avoidable with routine cleaning. Energy.gov.au
Economizers & OA paths: Mis-tuned economizers are common and costly; retuning and sensor QA via FDD is repeatedly highlighted in DOE/NREL/PNNL guidance as a top-tier low-cost fix. PNNL
RTU controls refresh: Campaign results and tech briefs demonstrate that advanced RTU control (variable fan, DCV, and economizer optimization) consistently yields energy reductions of more than 20%, with 25–50% reductions cited in certain deployments compared to legacy constant-speed, always-open baselines. Better Buildings Solution Center

Maintenance is mitigation. It’s also Scope 3-friendly: operating equipment at design efficiency extends service life and defers replacements, reducing embodied carbon churn in your capital plan. (See the measurement plan below to make these savings auditable.)

Turning kWh into CO₂e: a quick, defensible method

Your sustainability stakeholders care about tons, not watts. To translate HVAC savings into CO₂e:

Quantify energy from the measure (e.g., fan kWh drop from low-pressure filters; heating/cooling kWh or therms saved from DCV; kWh saved from FDD fixes).
Apply grid or fuel emission factors appropriate to the site(s) and year.
- U.S. electricity (2022 eGRID avg): ≈ 0.393 kg CO₂/kWh (867.5 lb/MWh delivered). US EPA+1
- Canada electricity (2025 factors) vary widely by province—e.g., Ontario: 38 g CO₂e/kWh; Alberta: 490 g CO₂e/kWh. Selecting the right regional factor matters. Canada.ca

If a low-pressure filter reduces fan energy by ~300 kWh/year per unit (magnitude depends on hours, fan size, and baseline pressure):

U.S. eGRID avg: 300 kWh × 0.393 kg/kWh ≈ 118 kg CO₂e/year per filter.
Ontario: 300 kWh × 0.038 kg/kWh ≈ 11 kg CO₂e/year per filter.

This is why portfolios across different grids see very different CO₂e per kWh outcomes. Even when the kWh savings are identical. US EPA

For transparency in ESG filings, reference the EPA eGRID subregion or the Government of Canada tables (or your utility-specific factors) and archive the PDFs used for each reporting year. US EPA

Risk management & IAQ alignment

Stay within ASHRAE 62.1 minimums at all times when spaces are occupied. DCV is about right-sizing, not starving air. Updated addenda clarify occupancy-based turndown rules—use them. ASHRAE
Filter choices: Seek equal or higher capture with lower ΔP; measure clean and loaded ΔP at your own face velocities. Research shows energy impact depends on filter design and system configuration, not only MERV. ScienceDirect
Measurement culture: Treat IAQ and energy as co-optimized objectives by trending PM, CO₂, temperature, and fan power together, so nobody is flying blind.

What this unlocks for 2026 capex

Once you bank the operational tons above, the economics of electrification, heat recovery, and heat pumps improve because you’re sizing for reduced loads. DOE/NREL work on advanced RTU control consistently shows meaningful kWh reductions when variable fans and DCV are layered in—think of these as pre-project multipliers that de-risk later capex. NREL Docs

The Power of the Overlooked 20%

In the rush to decarbonize, it’s tempting to chase the biggest, newest technologies. But the truth is that many of the most reliable carbon savings are already within reach. Hidden in fans, filters, ventilation rates, and maintenance routines.

Filtration, demand-controlled ventilation, and preventative maintenance may not make the headlines, but together they represent the overlooked 20% of actions that can deliver 80% of your emissions savings. They are measurable, repeatable, and scalable across portfolios, exactly the kind of solutions facility leaders need as they enter a new year of climate commitments.

Understanding Canada’s Carbon Reporting Requirements

Ava Montini
Jan 7, 2025
5 min read

Updated: Jan 28, 2025

Canadian companies required to report their carbon emissions face an increasing need to balance compliance with sustainability leadership. For larger businesses and public companies, carbon reporting is no longer about following regulations. It’s about meeting stakeholder expectations, addressing environmental challenges, and securing a competitive advantage in a rapidly evolving market.

Navigating Canada’s carbon reporting requirements might seem overwhelming, especially with the layers of federal, provincial, and international frameworks. But these challenges also bring opportunities—to improve operational efficiency, identify cost-saving measures, and build trust with investors and customers.

This guide aims to break down the complexities and provide actionable insights to help businesses comply while aligning with broader sustainability goals.

Why Carbon Reporting Matters

Carbon reporting has become a cornerstone of corporate accountability and a critical tool for mitigating climate change. In today’s market, stakeholders demand transparency regarding environmental impacts, which directly influences investor confidence, customer loyalty, and employee engagement. Public companies in Canada often find their carbon disclosure tied to financial performance metrics, and failure to comply can impact access to capital or even lead to penalties.

Beyond immediate compliance, carbon reporting reflects a company’s commitment to sustainability. By aligning business practices with Canada’s net-zero ambitions for 2050, companies can reduce their environmental footprint while positioning themselves as industry leaders.

The risk of inaction can be significant: businesses that fail to prioritize emissions reporting and reduction may face regulatory fines, reputational harm, and missed opportunities for innovation.

Overview of Canada’s Carbon Reporting Framework

Federal Regulations

Canada’s federal government has implemented comprehensive reporting programs to standardize emissions tracking and accountability. One of the cornerstone programs is the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Managed by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), this program mandates facilities emitting 10,000 tonnes or more of greenhouse gases (GHGs) annually to submit detailed emissions data. For those emitting over 50,000 tonnes, third-party verification becomes a mandatory requirement, adding another layer of rigour to the reporting process.

The Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act sets the national stage by establishing legally binding targets to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. While primarily focused on government accountability, the Act’s associated policies filter down to businesses through funding programs, technology incentives, and strategic initiatives that encourage industries to adopt cleaner practices.

Another critical component is carbon pricing and offsets. The federal Output-Based Pricing System (OBPS) applies to large industrial emitters, requiring them to track emissions and offset excesses through credits or direct reductions. Companies need to report accurately and integrate these calculations into their financial strategies, as carbon pricing directly impacts operational costs.

Provincial and Territorial Regulations

Provincial and territorial governments add another layer of complexity. Regulations vary by region, reflecting local priorities and emissions profiles:

Ontario has introduced the Emissions Performance Standards (EPS), which require facilities emitting 10,000 tonnes or more of GHGs annually to report and adhere to sector-specific benchmarks. This system provides flexibility but also demands meticulous emissions tracking.
British Columbia focuses on public accountability through its Climate Change Accountability Act. While primarily targeting public-sector organizations, it offers guidelines for businesses interested in voluntary reporting, creating an environment of proactive sustainability.
Quebec operates a cap-and-trade system, one of North America’s most robust. Businesses emitting over 25,000 tonnes of GHGs annually are required to participate, submitting emissions data to ensure compliance with allocated caps and trading allowances as needed.

For businesses operating across provinces, this mosaic of regulations underscores the importance of tailored, region-specific reporting strategies.

International Reporting Standards

Canadian companies with global operations or international investors may also need to align with widely recognized frameworks like the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). These frameworks emphasize the integration of climate-related risks into financial disclosures, offering guidance on best practices for reporting Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 emissions. Adhering to these standards can enhance credibility with international stakeholders and ensure readiness for emerging global regulations.

Key Steps for Compliance

1. Understand Your Obligations

Compliance begins with a thorough assessment of applicable reporting requirements. Start by identifying which federal, provincial, and international frameworks apply to your operations. This will depend on factors such as your industry, geographic footprint, and annual emissions levels. Companies operating in multiple provinces must account for variations in regional regulations and ensure that their reporting systems can handle these complexities.

2. Implement Robust Data Collection Systems

Accurate data collection is the foundation of effective carbon reporting. Businesses should invest in systems capable of tracking emissions across all scopes:

Scope 1 emissions cover direct emissions from owned or controlled sources, such as fuel combustion in company vehicles or manufacturing processes.
Scope 2 emissions refer to indirect emissions from purchased electricity, steam, heating, or cooling.
Scope 3 emissions include all other indirect emissions across the value chain, such as supplier activities, employee commuting, and waste disposal.

Learn more about Scope 1, 2, 3 Emissions here

Advanced software solutions can automate data collection, reducing human error and improving reporting accuracy. For larger organizations, integrating emissions tracking into existing enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems can streamline operations and ensure consistency across departments.

3. Seek Third-Party Verification

Third-party verification is not just a regulatory requirement for some businesses; it’s also a critical trust-building tool. Independent audits lend credibility to your emissions data, reassuring investors and regulators that your disclosures are accurate and reliable. Verification partners, such as Bureau Veritas, SGS, and DNV, specialize in conducting thorough audits and providing certification for environmental compliance. These organizations often go beyond basic verification, offering insights into data gaps and areas for improvement, helping companies refine their reporting processes and maintain long-term accuracy.

4. Develop an Emissions Reduction Strategy

Carbon reporting is most impactful when paired with an actionable emissions reduction strategy. Use your emissions data to identify key areas for improvement, such as energy efficiency upgrades, renewable energy adoption, or supply chain optimization. For companies subject to carbon pricing, reductions can also translate into direct cost savings by lowering compliance obligations.

5. Stay Informed on Policy Changes

Canada’s regulatory landscape is constantly evolving to meet climate goals. Regularly review updates from Environment and Climate Change Canada, as well as provincial and territorial authorities. Engaging with industry associations can also provide early insights into upcoming policy shifts, ensuring that your organization remains ahead of the curve.

Benefits Beyond Compliance

Committing to robust carbon reporting and reduction offers far-reaching benefits. Transparent emissions disclosures can attract sustainability-focused investors who are increasingly scrutinizing ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) metrics. Operationally, emissions tracking often highlights inefficiencies, leading to cost savings and streamlined processes. Furthermore, by taking a proactive stance on sustainability, companies enhance their brand reputation, fostering loyalty among environmentally conscious consumers and employees alike.

Resources for Canadian Businesses

Navigating carbon reporting can be challenging, but there are numerous resources available to support businesses:

Environment and Climate Change Canada’s GHGRP Portal: A comprehensive guide to federal reporting requirements. Visit Here
Canada’s Climate Action Incentive Fund: Financial support for businesses investing in emissions reductions. Visit Here
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD): A globally recognized framework for climate-related disclosures. Visit Here

Canada’s carbon reporting requirements represent a vital step toward addressing climate change and fostering a more sustainable future. For businesses, compliance is an opportunity to demonstrate leadership, drive operational improvements, and build stakeholder trust. By adopting detailed and transparent carbon reporting practices, companies can position themselves as change-makers in the transition to a net-zero economy.

Insights Hub

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur