top of page

Facility Changes That Drive 80% of Emissions Savings

The overlooked 20% of building strategies can deliver 80% of emissions savings. Here’s how to reset your 2026 baseline.

Ava Montini

Jan 6, 2026

Written by 

Published on

Tags

The 80/20 Pattern in Building Decarbonization


In business, the Pareto principle (the idea that 20% of actions create 80% of results) shows up everywhere. It also applies to the way buildings decarbonize.



Most portfolios still treat carbon reduction as a capital-projects problem: new chillers, new boilers, new equipment. These projects are visible, expensive, and easy to headline in ESG reports. But in practice, the biggest near-term gains lie in the systems that are already running every hour of every day.


According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, space heating, cooling, and ventilation are among the top energy end-uses in commercial buildings, with ventilation alone consuming nearly 10% of the total building energy. Factor in heating and cooling, and the air systems you already own set the floor for your emissions profile. Industry surveys and guidance reinforce this point: HVAC systems consistently account for approximately 40% of energy use in commercial facilities. A share that shifts by climate zone but remains dominant across the board.


Before you buy new megawatts, make the watts you already use travel a shorter, smarter, more efficient path.


Filtration as a carbon multiplier (not a consumable line item)



Why filtration matters for energy (and CO₂e)

Filters impose a pressure drop; fans work against that resistance. Basic fan/affinity laws tell us that pressure rises with the square of fan speed, and fan power typically scales with pressure/flow requirements. Therefore, adding resistance increases fan energy unless the system compensates by reducing the flow.


On variable-speed systems that maintain flow, peer-reviewed work shows roughly linear fan-power response to added system pressure: a 10% rise in total pressure drop ≈ 10% rise in fan electric power (assumes fan and motor efficiencies roughly constant at operating point). CaEE


Field and lab studies show that higher filter resistance reduces supply airflow and can increase total power (especially as filters load), degrading cooling capacity and forcing longer runtimes. Newer research also documents the compounding effects of filter loading, with heavy clogging cutting net supply airflow by >30%, a textbook example of invisible energy waste. ScienceDirect


Moving up in MERV doesn’t automatically mean higher energy costs. Well-designed filters use optimized media and geometry (like deeper pleats or more surface area) to keep airflow resistance low. Studies have shown that these higher-efficiency filters can have a lower pressure drop than inexpensive MERV 8 pleated filters, especially when systems are properly balanced. In other words, it’s the filter’s pressure profile that matters, not just the MERV number. ScienceDirect


If you can lower your filter pressure drop while maintaining or improving capture, you directly reduce continuous fan energy. One of the few all-hours loads in many facilities. Because fans run whenever you condition or ventilate space, these savings translate cleanly into CO₂e reductions (see Section 5 for the math).


Demand-Controlled Ventilation (DCV)



What DCV does

It modulates outside-air intake based on occupancy (CO₂, people-count, scheduling) to avoid conditioning empty spaces. Codes and standards increasingly require or encourage DCV in high-occupancy areas, with ASHRAE 62.1 updates clarifying when and how ventilation turndown is permitted (including addenda that allow reduction to zero OA during verified unoccupied periods in certain space types). ASHRAE


Across building types and climates, published work shows that DCV control logic achieves ~9–33% HVAC energy savings. Advanced rooftop-unit control packages, which incorporate multi-speed/variable fans, DCV, and smarter economizer control, have delivered double-digit fan and cooling savings, sometimes exceeding 20%. Taylor & Francis Online


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) analyses flag that cost-effectiveness depends on the baseline over-ventilation and occupancy patterns; if your current minimums are already close to code, savings shrink. That’s a guidance feature, not a flaw—the point is to measure your baseline VRs before projecting benefits. Energy Technologies Area


DCV is a surgical lever: attack over-ventilation where it exists, prove reductions with trend data, and lock in permanent load reductions; especially valuable in heating-dominated regions where conditioning outside air is expensive in both energy and CO₂e. Energy Codes Guide


Preventative Maintenance


Controls drift, coils foul, dampers stick, sensors mis-calibrate—quietly taxing 5–15% of portfolio energy in many studies. Modern fault detection & diagnostics (FDD) tools and structured maintenance programs quickly recapture that waste. NREL Docs


  1. Coil fouling: Government and academic sources document material energy penalties from dirty coils; some guidance cites compressor energy up to ~30% higher with fouled condensers (case and climate dependent). Even conservative findings confirm meaningful efficiency and capacity degradation. Avoidable with routine cleaning. Energy.gov.au


  2. Economizers & OA paths: Mis-tuned economizers are common and costly; retuning and sensor QA via FDD is repeatedly highlighted in DOE/NREL/PNNL guidance as a top-tier low-cost fix. PNNL


  3. RTU controls refresh: Campaign results and tech briefs demonstrate that advanced RTU control (variable fan, DCV, and economizer optimization) consistently yields energy reductions of more than 20%, with 25–50% reductions cited in certain deployments compared to legacy constant-speed, always-open baselines. Better Buildings Solution Center


Maintenance is mitigation. It’s also Scope 3-friendly: operating equipment at design efficiency extends service life and defers replacements, reducing embodied carbon churn in your capital plan. (See the measurement plan below to make these savings auditable.)


Turning kWh into CO₂e: a quick, defensible method

Your sustainability stakeholders care about tons, not watts. To translate HVAC savings into CO₂e:

  1. Quantify energy from the measure (e.g., fan kWh drop from low-pressure filters; heating/cooling kWh or therms saved from DCV; kWh saved from FDD fixes).

  2. Apply grid or fuel emission factors appropriate to the site(s) and year.

    • U.S. electricity (2022 eGRID avg): ≈ 0.393 kg CO₂/kWh (867.5 lb/MWh delivered). US EPA+1

    • Canada electricity (2025 factors) vary widely by province—e.g., Ontario: 38 g CO₂e/kWh; Alberta: 490 g CO₂e/kWh. Selecting the right regional factor matters. Canada.ca


If a low-pressure filter reduces fan energy by ~300 kWh/year per unit (magnitude depends on hours, fan size, and baseline pressure):

  • U.S. eGRID avg: 300 kWh × 0.393 kg/kWh ≈ 118 kg CO₂e/year per filter.

  • Ontario: 300 kWh × 0.038 kg/kWh ≈ 11 kg CO₂e/year per filter.

This is why portfolios across different grids see very different CO₂e per kWh outcomes. Even when the kWh savings are identical. US EPA


For transparency in ESG filings, reference the EPA eGRID subregion or the Government of Canada tables (or your utility-specific factors) and archive the PDFs used for each reporting year. US EPA


Risk management & IAQ alignment

  • Stay within ASHRAE 62.1 minimums at all times when spaces are occupied. DCV is about right-sizing, not starving air. Updated addenda clarify occupancy-based turndown rules—use them. ASHRAE

  • Filter choices: Seek equal or higher capture with lower ΔP; measure clean and loaded ΔP at your own face velocities. Research shows energy impact depends on filter design and system configuration, not only MERV. ScienceDirect

  • Measurement culture: Treat IAQ and energy as co-optimized objectives by trending PM, CO₂, temperature, and fan power together, so nobody is flying blind.


What this unlocks for 2026 capex

Once you bank the operational tons above, the economics of electrification, heat recovery, and heat pumps improve because you’re sizing for reduced loads. DOE/NREL work on advanced RTU control consistently shows meaningful kWh reductions when variable fans and DCV are layered in—think of these as pre-project multipliers that de-risk later capex. NREL Docs


The Power of the Overlooked 20%

In the rush to decarbonize, it’s tempting to chase the biggest, newest technologies. But the truth is that many of the most reliable carbon savings are already within reach. Hidden in fans, filters, ventilation rates, and maintenance routines.


Filtration, demand-controlled ventilation, and preventative maintenance may not make the headlines, but together they represent the overlooked 20% of actions that can deliver 80% of your emissions savings. They are measurable, repeatable, and scalable across portfolios, exactly the kind of solutions facility leaders need as they enter a new year of climate commitments.

Navigating Scope 1, 2, and 3 Carbon Emissions

  • Writer: Ava Montini
    Ava Montini
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • 8 min read

A Guide for Transparent and Responsible Reporting in Commercial Facilities


In the face of growing climate concerns, businesses across industries are under increasing pressure to account for their environmental impact. One of the most significant measures of this impact is a company's carbon footprint, which encompasses the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions produced directly or indirectly by its activities. To tackle this challenge, companies must engage in transparent and comprehensive emissions reporting—a practice that has become essential for regulatory compliance but also for building trust with stakeholders, including customers, investors, and employees.


The Greenhouse Gas Protocol, developed by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), is the leading global standard for measuring and reporting emissions. It introduces a structured approach by categorizing emissions into three scopes: Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3.


Each scope helps companies pinpoint where emissions originate, from direct operations to the broader supply chain, enabling them to develop targeted strategies for emissions reduction. This structured approach is particularly crucial in energy-intensive sectors like commercial facilities and HVAC, where emissions are high and the potential for meaningful reductions is significant.


The Importance of Comprehensive Carbon Emissions Reporting

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), the built environment, which includes all residential, commercial, and industrial buildings, is responsible for nearly 30% of global energy-related carbon emissions.


Within this sector, commercial facilities play a pivotal role in emissions reduction efforts, as they are among the largest consumers of energy due to heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) demands. By publicly reporting their emissions across all three scopes, businesses in this sector contribute to global climate goals and also position themselves for competitive advantage and regulatory readiness.


Transparent emissions reporting goes beyond compliance; it is an opportunity for companies to show leadership in sustainability. The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), an international non-profit that promotes transparency in environmental reporting, reports that over 13,000+ companies worldwide now disclose emissions data across their value chains (CDP). This shift toward transparency reflects a growing understanding that managing and reducing emissions is essential to business resilience in a low-carbon economy. For commercial facilities, adopting this practice is not only an ethical choice but also a strategic move to improve efficiency, reduce operational costs, and align with the expectations of eco-conscious clients and investors.


What Are Scope 1, 2, and 3 Emissions?

Companies need to understand the different types of emissions their operations produce to effectively manage and reduce carbon emissions. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol breaks these emissions into three distinct categories, or "scopes," which help businesses identify and take responsibility for their environmental impact across their entire value chain.


Each scope represents a different layer of emissions accountability, from the direct emissions produced by a company’s own operations to the indirect emissions generated throughout its supply chain. This categorization is particularly useful for large organizations, like commercial facilities, where energy use spans multiple levels, from on-site equipment to energy purchased for heating and cooling, and even to the emissions generated by suppliers and end-users. By analyzing emissions through the lens of Scope 1, 2, and 3, companies can more accurately track their carbon footprint, prioritize areas for improvement, and create targeted reduction strategies that align with broader sustainability goals.


This approach also allows businesses to communicate their efforts transparently to stakeholders, showing precisely where emissions occur and the steps being taken to reduce them. As the demand for sustainability intensifies, investors, regulatory bodies, and consumers alike are increasingly expected to expect this level of transparency, as they are looking for companies that demonstrate a proactive approach to managing their environmental impact.


Scope 1



Direct Emissions from Owned or Controlled Sources

Scope 1 emissions cover direct greenhouse gas emissions from sources that a company owns or controls, such as vehicle emissions, fuel combustion in on-site equipment, or leaks from refrigerant systems. For commercial facilities, sources of Scope 1 emissions often include HVAC systems, heating and cooling equipment, and standby power generators. The Department of Energy (DOE) notes that HVAC systems alone account for 35% of energy consumption in commercial buildings, highlighting a significant opportunity for direct emissions reduction.


For a commercial facility, Scope 1 emissions might come from company-owned generators used for backup power during outages.


Mitigation Strategies and Examples

Reducing Scope 1 emissions requires examining on-site equipment and fuel use. Strategies for Scope 1 emissions reductions often include electrification, biofuel adoption, and/or refrigerant management.


Electrification and Energy Source Conversion

Many companies are shifting away from fossil fuels, replacing natural gas or oil with electric heating, solar thermal systems, or biofuels. According to BloombergNEF, electrifying buildings, alongside other key sectors, could reduce global carbon emissions by approximately 20-25% by 2050, as part of the transition to a net-zero future.


Refrigerant Management

Low-GWP (Global Warming Potential) refrigerants can significantly cut emissions from cooling systems. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) GreenChill Partnership highlights that transitioning to low-global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants can significantly reduce CO₂ emissions. While specific figures per building may vary, the program emphasizes substantial environmental benefits through the adoption of environmentally friendlier refrigeration systems.


Scope 2


Indirect Emissions from Purchased Energy

Scope 2 emissions are associated with the generation of purchased electricity, steam, heating, or cooling consumed by a business. For commercial facilities, these emissions are often tied to energy-intensive systems, such as HVAC, lighting, and IT infrastructure.


A data center’s Scope 2 emissions largely stem from the purchased electricity that powers its servers and cooling systems.


Mitigation Strategies and Examples


Addressing Scope 2 emissions involves both reducing overall energy consumption and transitioning to cleaner energy sources, helping businesses minimize the environmental impact of the electricity, heating, and cooling they purchase. By focusing on these areas, companies can strategically lower their indirect emissions and support a more sustainable energy system.


Energy Efficiency Upgrades

Energy-efficient HVAC systems, such as those with low-pressure drop air filters like Blade Air's Pro Filter, reduce the energy needed for heating and cooling. Implementing high-efficiency HVAC systems can decrease HVAC energy use by an average of 15%.


Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and On-Site Renewables

Purchasing RECs allows companies to offset Scope 2 emissions by supporting renewable energy generation. Additionally, on-site solar panels can directly reduce reliance on grid-supplied electricity, minimizing carbon intensity (National Renewable Energy Laboratory).


Scope 3


Indirect Emissions from the Value Chain

Scope 3 emissions are the most complex category, covering indirect emissions both upstream and downstream, including the production of purchased goods, transportation, employee commuting, and even the end use of products. As the World Economic Forum (WEF) notes, Scope 3 emissions typically constitute 70% of a company's total emissions (WEF). For commercial facilities, these can include emissions from manufacturing and transporting building materials, waste disposal, and even tenant activities.


Scope 3 emissions could include the emissions produced when employees commute to work or travel for business meetings.


Mitigation Strategies and Examples

Scope 3 emissions require collaboration across the supply chain and often involve initiatives that encourage sustainable practices among suppliers, employees, and customers.


Supplier Sustainability Programs

Engaging suppliers to reduce upstream emissions can drastically affect Scope 3 emissions. Many organizations, including Blade Air, work with suppliers on sustainability improvements and seek out environmentally responsible partners.


Product Lifecycle and End-of-Life Management

Promoting products that support circular economy principles, such as Blade Air's recyclable filter pads, helps minimize waste and cut down on Scope 3 emissions from disposal.


Common Sources of Scope 1, 2, and 3 Emissions


Understanding the primary sources of carbon emissions within Scope 1, 2, and 3 categories is essential for effective emissions management. Each scope encompasses specific activities, both direct and indirect, that contribute to a business's overall greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint.


Scope 1: Direct Emissions (Our Operations)


Scope 1 emissions are direct emissions that come from sources owned or controlled by a business.


Common sources include:

  • Fleet Fuel Use: Emissions from company-owned vehicles, such as delivery trucks, service vans, and other fleet vehicles, contribute significantly to Scope 1 emissions.

  • Stationary Combustion: Natural gas or other fuels are used for power generation and fuel use in boilers, furnaces, and other on-site equipment.

  • Fugitive Emissions are unintentional leaks from equipment such as air conditioning units or refrigerant systems. They also include leaks of gases like SF₆ (sulphur hexafluoride) used in electric equipment.

  • LNG Venting and Fuel: For companies in sectors like energy, liquefied natural gas (LNG) venting or use in operations contributes to direct emissions.


Scope 2: Indirect Emissions (Energy Purchased)


Scope 2 emissions stem from the generation of purchased electricity, heat, and steam. Although the energy is produced elsewhere, the end-use emissions are attributed to the company using the energy.


Common sources include:

  • Electricity Consumption: Energy used for lighting, HVAC systems, IT infrastructure, and other equipment within facilities.

  • Transmission and Distribution Losses: Emissions associated with the energy lost during the transmission and distribution of electricity to the business.

  • Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG): In certain cases, LNG used for electricity generation may contribute to Scope 2 emissions when used as a purchased source.


Scope 3: Indirect Emissions (Value Chain Upstream and Downstream)


Scope 3 emissions are indirect emissions from sources not owned or directly controlled by the business, covering both upstream and downstream activities in the value chain. These emissions are often the largest and most complex to manage. Common sources include:


Upstream Emissions

  • Purchased Goods and Services: Emissions from the production and transportation of goods and services a business buys.

  • Business Travel and Employee Commuting: Emissions from air travel, hotel stays, and employee commuting contribute to a company’s carbon footprint.

  • Waste Management: Disposal and treatment of waste generated in business operations can lead to emissions, especially if waste is incinerated or sent to landfills.

  • Upstream Fuel Emissions: Emissions related to the extraction, production, and transportation of fuels before they are consumed.


Downstream Emissions:

  • Product Use: Emissions from the use of products sold by the business, such as fuel combustion in customer-owned vehicles or equipment.

  • End-of-life disposal is the disposal or recycling of products after their use, including any emissions associated with product breakdown or disposal.

  • Transmission and Distribution of Sold Energy: Losses incurred in energy distribution to end-users also contribute to downstream emissions.


By identifying these common sources within each scope, companies can develop targeted strategies to reduce their GHG emissions, whether by improving energy efficiency in operations, switching to renewable energy sources, or working with suppliers to adopt sustainable practices. Addressing emissions across all scopes is critical to achieving comprehensive carbon management and meeting sustainability goals.


The Intersection of Indoor Air Quality and Energy Consumption


Indoor air quality (IAQ) is essential for the health and productivity of building occupants, but it also significantly impacts a facility's energy consumption and emissions profile. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems account for approximately 35% of the energy used in commercial buildings. This high energy demand contributes heavily to Scope 2 emissions, underscoring the importance of efficient HVAC management as part of a comprehensive carbon reduction strategy.


A Harvard School of Public Health study found that improved IAQ can enhance cognitive function and productivity by 61%, with energy-efficient ventilation solutions helping companies meet both health and sustainability goals.


Adopting a thorough approach to Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions reporting is essential for commercial facilities to meet regulatory standards, build stakeholder trust, and drive industry innovation. With HVAC systems as a primary focus for emissions and IAQ, companies have a unique opportunity to reduce energy demand, improve indoor air quality, and support a healthier, more sustainable built environment.


Blade Air is dedicated to helping facilities navigate these goals through energy-efficient, low-impact air filtration solutions. By integrating emissions management with IAQ improvements, businesses can make strides toward a carbon-neutral future while creating healthier, more resilient workplaces—setting a new standard for sustainable, responsible operations.

Explore expert insights, stay up-to-date with industry events, and gain a deeper understanding of the developments shaping the built environment.

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter below for exclusive early access to Blade's Insights content.

Insights Hub

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Sit quis auctor 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet cotetur 

bottom of page